https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108700 In a section 11 proceeding under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the Court's role is limited to securing appointment of an arbitrator when the agreed procedure fails; it cannot decide disputed questions of arbitrability, the scope of the arbitration agreement, or whether particular claims are excepted matters. Those jurisdictional objections are for the arbitral tribunal to determine under section 16. The Delhi HC therefore held that the appointing authority could not withhold reference of some claims on arbitrability grounds, and the nominated arbitrator remained free to decide all objections, including whether any claim fell outside the scope of arbitration. en-us Thu, 09 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Apr 2012 14:46:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108700 In a section 11 proceeding under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the Court's role is limited to securing appointment of an arbitrator when the agreed procedure fails; it cannot decide disputed questions of arbitrability, the scope of the arbitration agreement, or whether particular claims are excepted matters. Those jurisdictional objections are for the arbitral tribunal to determine under section 16. The Delhi HC therefore held that the appointing authority could not withhold reference of some claims on arbitrability grounds, and the nominated arbitrator remained free to decide all objections, including whether any claim fell outside the scope of arbitration. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 09 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108700