https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108687 Authorised short-term banking transactions routed through intermediary accounts did not, on the majority view, establish criminal conspiracy, criminal breach of trust, forgery, use of forged documents, dishonest misappropriation, or abuse of official position because the board and committee resolutions showed a legitimate investment purpose and the evidence did not prove a dishonest agreement or wrongful gain beyond reasonable doubt. The Special Court's jurisdiction under the securities offences statute was confined to transactions within its statutory window, so pre-1 April 1991 transactions could not be tried there absent a proved conspiracy extending them into that period. The majority set aside one conviction, upheld one acquittal, and maintained the remaining convictions with sentence reduction for two accused. en-us Tue, 14 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Dec 2017 17:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108687 Authorised short-term banking transactions routed through intermediary accounts did not, on the majority view, establish criminal conspiracy, criminal breach of trust, forgery, use of forged documents, dishonest misappropriation, or abuse of official position because the board and committee resolutions showed a legitimate investment purpose and the evidence did not prove a dishonest agreement or wrongful gain beyond reasonable doubt. The Special Court's jurisdiction under the securities offences statute was confined to transactions within its statutory window, so pre-1 April 1991 transactions could not be tried there absent a proved conspiracy extending them into that period. The majority set aside one conviction, upheld one acquittal, and maintained the remaining convictions with sentence reduction for two accused. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 14 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108687