https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108665 Exchange-traded contract notes executed in the prescribed form, together with ledger entries and bye-laws, were treated as a valid arbitration agreement because the dealings were real and the authorised signatory had signed relevant documents. The claim was not time-barred in a running account context, as the cause of action was taken to arise when the demanded amount remained unpaid, and that view was not disturbed in section 34 review. Objections based on non-joinder of the authorised signatory, non-specification of the claim amount, and alleged non-consideration of the defence were rejected because the award reflected consideration of the defence and no procedural infirmity was shown. en-us Wed, 08 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Apr 2012 12:40:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108665 Exchange-traded contract notes executed in the prescribed form, together with ledger entries and bye-laws, were treated as a valid arbitration agreement because the dealings were real and the authorised signatory had signed relevant documents. The claim was not time-barred in a running account context, as the cause of action was taken to arise when the demanded amount remained unpaid, and that view was not disturbed in section 34 review. Objections based on non-joinder of the authorised signatory, non-specification of the claim amount, and alleged non-consideration of the defence were rejected because the award reflected consideration of the defence and no procedural infirmity was shown. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 08 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108665