<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 550 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108663</link>
    <description>An appellate tribunal may permit correction of an original application after disposal where the amendment merely remedies an accidental omission and reflects a claim already contemplated in the pleadings and supporting material. The power to make such post-judgment correction was treated as arising from provisions dealing with accidental slips, omissions and clerical errors, read with the court&#039;s inherent power, but not as authority to introduce a wholly new claim. On the record, no request for time to file a reply before the tribunal was shown, and the petitioners&#039; legal objection was considered; no breach of natural justice was established.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 12:37:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 550 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108663</link>
      <description>An appellate tribunal may permit correction of an original application after disposal where the amendment merely remedies an accidental omission and reflects a claim already contemplated in the pleadings and supporting material. The power to make such post-judgment correction was treated as arising from provisions dealing with accidental slips, omissions and clerical errors, read with the court&#039;s inherent power, but not as authority to introduce a wholly new claim. On the record, no request for time to file a reply before the tribunal was shown, and the petitioners&#039; legal objection was considered; no breach of natural justice was established.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108663</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>