<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 1056 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108662</link>
    <description>Clubbing of clearances cannot be sustained merely on common electricity connection or assumptions of dummy units without examining independent existence, trading or job work activity, further processing, deductions and classification. The Tribunal noted that the record did not adequately address the appellants&#039; defence that the units were separately functioning and that material pleas had not been considered in a reasoned manner. As the order was not a speaking order, it was set aside and the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication with full consideration of the factual and legal issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 12:37:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 1056 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108662</link>
      <description>Clubbing of clearances cannot be sustained merely on common electricity connection or assumptions of dummy units without examining independent existence, trading or job work activity, further processing, deductions and classification. The Tribunal noted that the record did not adequately address the appellants&#039; defence that the units were separately functioning and that material pleas had not been considered in a reasoned manner. As the order was not a speaking order, it was set aside and the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication with full consideration of the factual and legal issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>