<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (10) TMI 693 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108661</link>
    <description>Demand based on allegations that four interlinked units were dummy units could not be sustained where the show cause notice was issued only to one unit and not to the others. Because the remaining units were also named in the allegations but were given no opportunity to answer them, the adjudication breached the principles of natural justice. The order was therefore unsustainable for want of notice to all concerned units.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 12:36:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145678" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (10) TMI 693 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108661</link>
      <description>Demand based on allegations that four interlinked units were dummy units could not be sustained where the show cause notice was issued only to one unit and not to the others. Because the remaining units were also named in the allegations but were given no opportunity to answer them, the adjudication breached the principles of natural justice. The order was therefore unsustainable for want of notice to all concerned units.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108661</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>