<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 549 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108660</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the applications due to the invalidity of the transaction under Section 531 of the Companies Act, preventing the applicant from obtaining relief based on the contested agreement. The judgment highlighted the importance of legal compliance and timelines in commercial transactions, emphasizing the need for parties to adhere to legal provisions and procedures in such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 12:36:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145677" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 549 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108660</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the applications due to the invalidity of the transaction under Section 531 of the Companies Act, preventing the applicant from obtaining relief based on the contested agreement. The judgment highlighted the importance of legal compliance and timelines in commercial transactions, emphasizing the need for parties to adhere to legal provisions and procedures in such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108660</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>