https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108653 The court found in favor of the petitioner in CP 332 of 2000, ruling that the respondent failed to provide a bona fide defense and ordering the respondent to deposit Rs. 25,00,000 within fifteen days and an additional amount thereafter. The court dismissed the respondent's contentions of lost cheques, false complaints, and time-barred debts, emphasizing discrepancies in financial documents and the lack of a credible defense. The court also mentioned a similar judgment in CP 333 of 2000, directing a deposit by the respondent and potential appointment of a Provisional Liquidator in both cases. en-us Fri, 20 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Apr 2012 12:19:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108653 The court found in favor of the petitioner in CP 332 of 2000, ruling that the respondent failed to provide a bona fide defense and ordering the respondent to deposit Rs. 25,00,000 within fifteen days and an additional amount thereafter. The court dismissed the respondent's contentions of lost cheques, false complaints, and time-barred debts, emphasizing discrepancies in financial documents and the lack of a credible defense. The court also mentioned a similar judgment in CP 333 of 2000, directing a deposit by the respondent and potential appointment of a Provisional Liquidator in both cases. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 20 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108653