<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 502 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108647</link>
    <description>An arbitral award enforceable under section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 must be executed before the Principal Civil Court of original jurisdiction in the district, because &quot;Court&quot; under section 2(e) excludes inferior courts. Read with the Code of Civil Procedure and the General Clauses Act, the proper forum is the District Court having jurisdiction over the subject-matter of the dispute as if it were a suit. Jurisdictional tests for where a suit may lie do not shift enforcement to a lower civil court. An execution petition before the Senior Civil Judge, Miryalaguda, was therefore not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 12:05:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 502 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108647</link>
      <description>An arbitral award enforceable under section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 must be executed before the Principal Civil Court of original jurisdiction in the district, because &quot;Court&quot; under section 2(e) excludes inferior courts. Read with the Code of Civil Procedure and the General Clauses Act, the proper forum is the District Court having jurisdiction over the subject-matter of the dispute as if it were a suit. Jurisdictional tests for where a suit may lie do not shift enforcement to a lower civil court. An execution petition before the Senior Civil Judge, Miryalaguda, was therefore not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108647</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>