<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 501 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108645</link>
    <description>Persons exercising de facto control over a company&#039;s affairs may be proceeded against for misfeasance, breach of trust and misapplication of funds even without formal appointment as directors, where the material shows actual direction, diversion of assets and loss to the company. Documentary material such as the official liquidator&#039;s report, auditors&#039; report and statements recorded under the Companies (Court) Rules may be sufficient to establish liability when the facts are not seriously controverted, and oral evidence or cross-examination is not invariably required. On those findings, a request for discharge by the ex-directors or controlling persons cannot be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 12:01:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 501 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108645</link>
      <description>Persons exercising de facto control over a company&#039;s affairs may be proceeded against for misfeasance, breach of trust and misapplication of funds even without formal appointment as directors, where the material shows actual direction, diversion of assets and loss to the company. Documentary material such as the official liquidator&#039;s report, auditors&#039; report and statements recorded under the Companies (Court) Rules may be sufficient to establish liability when the facts are not seriously controverted, and oral evidence or cross-examination is not invariably required. On those findings, a request for discharge by the ex-directors or controlling persons cannot be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108645</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>