<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 507 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108609</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, setting aside the confiscation order of 2400 &#039;FUDS&#039; make Alarm Clocks under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act. The appellant successfully challenged the order by presenting legal arguments regarding the eligibility for restricted import, lack of evidence for illegal import, and discrepancies in documents, leading to the grant of relief and the reversal of the confiscation decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 18:57:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145626" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 507 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108609</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, setting aside the confiscation order of 2400 &#039;FUDS&#039; make Alarm Clocks under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act. The appellant successfully challenged the order by presenting legal arguments regarding the eligibility for restricted import, lack of evidence for illegal import, and discrepancies in documents, leading to the grant of relief and the reversal of the confiscation decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108609</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>