<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 506 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108608</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order in a case involving manufacturers of Voltage Stabilisers availing benefits under Notification No. 88/88-C.E. The manufacturers were found to have complied with the notification&#039;s conditions regarding the assembly of components in rural areas by registered cooperative societies. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of interpreting the notification in line with legislative intent and upheld the eligibility criteria for benefit under the notification. The appeal by the Revenue was rejected, affirming the validity of the Commissioner&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 18:48:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 506 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108608</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order in a case involving manufacturers of Voltage Stabilisers availing benefits under Notification No. 88/88-C.E. The manufacturers were found to have complied with the notification&#039;s conditions regarding the assembly of components in rural areas by registered cooperative societies. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of interpreting the notification in line with legislative intent and upheld the eligibility criteria for benefit under the notification. The appeal by the Revenue was rejected, affirming the validity of the Commissioner&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>