<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 504 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108603</link>
    <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) reduced the redemption fine and personal penalty imposed by the Additional Commissioner in a case involving the confiscation of bags of calcium stearate found in different premises. The tribunal upheld the confiscation for technical violations but found no reason to interfere with the reduced redemption fine. Additionally, the tribunal upheld the decision to clear additional bags found in the appellant&#039;s factory, stating they were not liable for confiscation due to the absence of mala fide intentions. Penalties for various individuals involved were also reduced and upheld based on the findings of the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 18:39:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145620" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 504 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108603</link>
      <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) reduced the redemption fine and personal penalty imposed by the Additional Commissioner in a case involving the confiscation of bags of calcium stearate found in different premises. The tribunal upheld the confiscation for technical violations but found no reason to interfere with the reduced redemption fine. Additionally, the tribunal upheld the decision to clear additional bags found in the appellant&#039;s factory, stating they were not liable for confiscation due to the absence of mala fide intentions. Penalties for various individuals involved were also reduced and upheld based on the findings of the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108603</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>