https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108574 The court dismissed the petition challenging the order summoning the petitioners as accused under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complaint was found to be maintainable as the notice served on the petitioners was deemed valid, emphasizing the importance of a clear intention for payment within the specified time frame. The court highlighted that only a notice meeting statutory requirements could trigger the limitation period to file a complaint, emphasizing the necessity of a proper notice for initiating legal action in cases of dishonoured cheques. en-us Mon, 11 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Apr 2012 17:27:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108574 The court dismissed the petition challenging the order summoning the petitioners as accused under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complaint was found to be maintainable as the notice served on the petitioners was deemed valid, emphasizing the importance of a clear intention for payment within the specified time frame. The court highlighted that only a notice meeting statutory requirements could trigger the limitation period to file a complaint, emphasizing the necessity of a proper notice for initiating legal action in cases of dishonoured cheques. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 11 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108574