<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 661 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108572</link>
    <description>A reference to arbitration under section 20 of the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 requires a subsisting arbitration agreement covering the dispute. Where a later settlement records full and final satisfaction and expressly discharges the earlier arbitration clause, the original clause ceases to survive. The court must first decide whether the arbitration agreement still exists before directing a reference, and it cannot leave that foundational to the arbitrator. On these facts, the settlement extinguished the arbitration clause, so the direction to refer the dispute to arbitration was without jurisdiction and liable to be set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 17:15:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145589" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 661 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108572</link>
      <description>A reference to arbitration under section 20 of the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 requires a subsisting arbitration agreement covering the dispute. Where a later settlement records full and final satisfaction and expressly discharges the earlier arbitration clause, the original clause ceases to survive. The court must first decide whether the arbitration agreement still exists before directing a reference, and it cannot leave that foundational to the arbitrator. On these facts, the settlement extinguished the arbitration clause, so the direction to refer the dispute to arbitration was without jurisdiction and liable to be set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108572</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>