<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 660 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108571</link>
    <description>A complaint under section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was treated as not maintainable where it was filed by a G.P.A. holder without the payees themselves signing or supporting it, and the defect was held fatal. The Magistrate&#039;s failure to examine the real complainants on oath as required by section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was held to vitiate the proceedings. Vicarious liability under section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act could not be fastened on a director who was not in charge of the company when the cheque was issued and dishonoured. On these grounds, the criminal proceedings were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 17:13:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 660 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108571</link>
      <description>A complaint under section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was treated as not maintainable where it was filed by a G.P.A. holder without the payees themselves signing or supporting it, and the defect was held fatal. The Magistrate&#039;s failure to examine the real complainants on oath as required by section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was held to vitiate the proceedings. Vicarious liability under section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act could not be fastened on a director who was not in charge of the company when the cheque was issued and dishonoured. On these grounds, the criminal proceedings were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108571</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>