https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108571 The court quashed the criminal proceedings in C.C. No. 1012 of 2000 due to the second petitioner's lack of responsibility for the dishonored cheques and the failure to comply with procedural requirements, including recording sworn statements under section 200 of Cr. P.C. The judgment emphasized the necessity of proper procedures and provided guidelines for cases involving complaints by G.P.A. holders to uphold fairness and legal standards. en-us Mon, 11 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Apr 2012 17:13:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108571 The court quashed the criminal proceedings in C.C. No. 1012 of 2000 due to the second petitioner's lack of responsibility for the dishonored cheques and the failure to comply with procedural requirements, including recording sworn statements under section 200 of Cr. P.C. The judgment emphasized the necessity of proper procedures and provided guidelines for cases involving complaints by G.P.A. holders to uphold fairness and legal standards. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 11 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108571