<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 657 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108568</link>
    <description>The court decreed the suit for recovery of Rs. 9,36,000 in favor of the plaintiffs, holding the defendants liable for the payment of Rs. 9,24,000 along with interest and costs. The judgment emphasized the defendants&#039; failure to deliver the shares or refund the amount despite legal notices and established payments by the plaintiffs. The court&#039;s decision was based on the unrebutted evidence, leading to the passing of the decree against the defendants for non-compliance and concealment of material facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 17:04:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 657 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108568</link>
      <description>The court decreed the suit for recovery of Rs. 9,36,000 in favor of the plaintiffs, holding the defendants liable for the payment of Rs. 9,24,000 along with interest and costs. The judgment emphasized the defendants&#039; failure to deliver the shares or refund the amount despite legal notices and established payments by the plaintiffs. The court&#039;s decision was based on the unrebutted evidence, leading to the passing of the decree against the defendants for non-compliance and concealment of material facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>