<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 695 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108563</link>
    <description>The Court clarified that the presence of an arbitration clause does not automatically prevent the Company Court from exercising jurisdiction in winding-up matters. Referring to relevant case law, the Court emphasized that the power to order winding-up is statutory and distinct from arbitration. It was held that if a bona fide dispute and substantial defense are raised, the Court will not wind up the company but may refer parties to arbitration. The Court dismissed the winding-up petition, directing the parties to resolve their disputes through arbitration as per their contract.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 16:21:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145580" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 695 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108563</link>
      <description>The Court clarified that the presence of an arbitration clause does not automatically prevent the Company Court from exercising jurisdiction in winding-up matters. Referring to relevant case law, the Court emphasized that the power to order winding-up is statutory and distinct from arbitration. It was held that if a bona fide dispute and substantial defense are raised, the Court will not wind up the company but may refer parties to arbitration. The Court dismissed the winding-up petition, directing the parties to resolve their disputes through arbitration as per their contract.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108563</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>