<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 689 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108557</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the petition, quashed the orders passed by the Tribunals, and directed the petitioner to pay Rs. 50,00,000.00 to the respondent-bank by a specified date. Failure to comply would result in legal actions by the bank. The deposited amount would accrue interest and be held separately. The final decision on the amount would be determined during the hearing for setting aside the ex parte decree.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 15:56:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145574" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 689 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108557</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the petition, quashed the orders passed by the Tribunals, and directed the petitioner to pay Rs. 50,00,000.00 to the respondent-bank by a specified date. Failure to comply would result in legal actions by the bank. The deposited amount would accrue interest and be held separately. The final decision on the amount would be determined during the hearing for setting aside the ex parte decree.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108557</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>