<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 688 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108556</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order confirming the Presiding Officer&#039;s decision was challenged due to a lack of proper notice and opportunity to be heard, violating natural justice principles. The request for waiver of pre-deposit was denied for expeditious adjudication, but the petitioner argued it didn&#039;t address the natural justice breach. The Tribunal&#039;s reliance on the balance sheet as admission of the claim was disputed. Both Tribunal orders were set aside, emphasizing the breach of natural justice. Parties were directed for a fresh consideration with the Bank given the chance to file a formal claim admission application. The rule was made absolute for the petitioner, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 15:54:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145573" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 688 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108556</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order confirming the Presiding Officer&#039;s decision was challenged due to a lack of proper notice and opportunity to be heard, violating natural justice principles. The request for waiver of pre-deposit was denied for expeditious adjudication, but the petitioner argued it didn&#039;t address the natural justice breach. The Tribunal&#039;s reliance on the balance sheet as admission of the claim was disputed. Both Tribunal orders were set aside, emphasizing the breach of natural justice. Parties were directed for a fresh consideration with the Bank given the chance to file a formal claim admission application. The rule was made absolute for the petitioner, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108556</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>