<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 685 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108553</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the company petition for winding up, emphasizing the availability of alternative remedies under sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act. The petitioners were advised to pursue these remedies to address their grievances. The court held that the petitioners acted unreasonably in seeking winding up without first attempting to resolve the issues through the available legal mechanisms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 15:42:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145570" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 685 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108553</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the company petition for winding up, emphasizing the availability of alternative remedies under sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act. The petitioners were advised to pursue these remedies to address their grievances. The court held that the petitioners acted unreasonably in seeking winding up without first attempting to resolve the issues through the available legal mechanisms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>