<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 684 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108552</link>
    <description>The court determined that the charge created by the second respondent in favor of the applicant and registered on August 16, 2000, was valid and exclusive, holding priority over the unregistered charge in favor of the third respondent. The court ordered the third respondent to transfer the title deeds of the immovable properties to the applicant and granted permission for the applicant to bring a suit against the official liquidator.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 15:34:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145569" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 684 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108552</link>
      <description>The court determined that the charge created by the second respondent in favor of the applicant and registered on August 16, 2000, was valid and exclusive, holding priority over the unregistered charge in favor of the third respondent. The court ordered the third respondent to transfer the title deeds of the immovable properties to the applicant and granted permission for the applicant to bring a suit against the official liquidator.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108552</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>