<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 681 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108549</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition for winding up the respondent-company, citing a bona fide dispute over the alleged debt, the speculative nature of returns, and the potential harm to the company and its employees. The petitioner failed to establish the debt, lacking locus standi for just and equitable grounds. Judicial discretion favored reviving the company to protect stakeholders, leading to the dismissal of the petition with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 14:19:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145566" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 681 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108549</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition for winding up the respondent-company, citing a bona fide dispute over the alleged debt, the speculative nature of returns, and the potential harm to the company and its employees. The petitioner failed to establish the debt, lacking locus standi for just and equitable grounds. Judicial discretion favored reviving the company to protect stakeholders, leading to the dismissal of the petition with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108549</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>