https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108532 Territorial jurisdiction under Article 226 to quash FIRs depends on where the substantial cause of action arose, and mere communication of SEBI-related material to Chennai was held insufficient when the alleged conspiracy and core events occurred in Kolkata. Because the offence-linked facts arose outside the High Court's jurisdiction, the writ petitions failed; the Court also declined to quash the FIRs or interrupt the ongoing investigation, noting that the complaints disclosed serious allegations requiring full inquiry. en-us Fri, 28 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Apr 2012 11:39:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108532 Territorial jurisdiction under Article 226 to quash FIRs depends on where the substantial cause of action arose, and mere communication of SEBI-related material to Chennai was held insufficient when the alleged conspiracy and core events occurred in Kolkata. Because the offence-linked facts arose outside the High Court's jurisdiction, the writ petitions failed; the Court also declined to quash the FIRs or interrupt the ongoing investigation, noting that the complaints disclosed serious allegations requiring full inquiry. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 28 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108532