<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 551 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108531</link>
    <description>A special debt recovery statute confers exclusive jurisdiction on the Tribunal for recovery of debts of the prescribed amount, and civil court jurisdiction is excluded once the Tribunal is constituted. A debt includes liability under a civil court decree, so post-decree proceedings, including an application to set aside an ex parte decree in a bank debt matter, must be taken before the Tribunal. A civil court that lacks jurisdiction cannot dismiss such an application on merits; it must return the matter for presentation before the competent forum. The civil court order was therefore unsustainable and the special statutory forum was preferred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 11:29:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145548" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 551 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108531</link>
      <description>A special debt recovery statute confers exclusive jurisdiction on the Tribunal for recovery of debts of the prescribed amount, and civil court jurisdiction is excluded once the Tribunal is constituted. A debt includes liability under a civil court decree, so post-decree proceedings, including an application to set aside an ex parte decree in a bank debt matter, must be taken before the Tribunal. A civil court that lacks jurisdiction cannot dismiss such an application on merits; it must return the matter for presentation before the competent forum. The civil court order was therefore unsustainable and the special statutory forum was preferred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108531</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>