https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108529 The court held that the trial court erred in allowing the plaintiff's amendment without addressing the jurisdictional issue. It was determined that civil courts lack jurisdiction over complaints under section 397 of the Companies Act, as these matters are within the purview of the Company Law Board. The revision was granted, setting aside the trial court's order and directing the return of the plaint due to lack of jurisdiction. en-us Wed, 26 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Apr 2012 11:23:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108529 The court held that the trial court erred in allowing the plaintiff's amendment without addressing the jurisdictional issue. It was determined that civil courts lack jurisdiction over complaints under section 397 of the Companies Act, as these matters are within the purview of the Company Law Board. The revision was granted, setting aside the trial court's order and directing the return of the plaint due to lack of jurisdiction. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 26 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108529