<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (6) TMI 351 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108526</link>
    <description>Modvat credit was available on duty-paid laminations and stampings cleared to job workers under the prescribed Rule 57F(2) procedure for manufacture of an intermediate product and received back with cross-referenced gate passes and challans. The documentation showed the required particulars for the inputs and final product, and the duty-paid character of the inputs was established. Rule 57J, read with the relevant notification, permitted credit on inputs used in making intermediate products for adjustment against duty on the final products. Credit could not be denied merely because the materials moved through challans and gate passes for intermediate processing, so the disallowance was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 10:58:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145543" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (6) TMI 351 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108526</link>
      <description>Modvat credit was available on duty-paid laminations and stampings cleared to job workers under the prescribed Rule 57F(2) procedure for manufacture of an intermediate product and received back with cross-referenced gate passes and challans. The documentation showed the required particulars for the inputs and final product, and the duty-paid character of the inputs was established. Rule 57J, read with the relevant notification, permitted credit on inputs used in making intermediate products for adjustment against duty on the final products. Credit could not be denied merely because the materials moved through challans and gate passes for intermediate processing, so the disallowance was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>