<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 547 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108522</link>
    <description>Section 29 of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 extends to property mortgaged by a surety or guarantor, even where that property does not belong to the borrowing industrial concern, so the Financial Corporation may proceed against such collateral security for recovery on default. The amended section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 does not bar section 29 action against guarantors during pendency of sickness proceedings, because the statutory bar is directed to suits and related recovery claims and does not convert section 29 enforcement into a prohibited proceeding. Recovery against the guarantors&#039; mortgaged properties was therefore legally permissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 10:27:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145539" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 547 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108522</link>
      <description>Section 29 of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 extends to property mortgaged by a surety or guarantor, even where that property does not belong to the borrowing industrial concern, so the Financial Corporation may proceed against such collateral security for recovery on default. The amended section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 does not bar section 29 action against guarantors during pendency of sickness proceedings, because the statutory bar is directed to suits and related recovery claims and does not convert section 29 enforcement into a prohibited proceeding. Recovery against the guarantors&#039; mortgaged properties was therefore legally permissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108522</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>