<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 546 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108521</link>
    <description>The court concluded that the scheme of arrangement was just, fair, and reasonable, emphasizing the commercial wisdom of the members and creditors who approved it. The appeals were dismissed with costs, and the scheme was sanctioned. The order was stayed for four weeks to allow the appellants to approach the Supreme Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 10:23:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145538" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 546 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108521</link>
      <description>The court concluded that the scheme of arrangement was just, fair, and reasonable, emphasizing the commercial wisdom of the members and creditors who approved it. The appeals were dismissed with costs, and the scheme was sanctioned. The order was stayed for four weeks to allow the appellants to approach the Supreme Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>