<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 544 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108519</link>
    <description>The court granted the winding up petition under section 433(e) of the Companies Act, appointing the Official Liquidator as the Provisional Liquidator of the respondent company due to an outstanding payment dispute. The respondent failed to dispute the debt and did not provide evidence to rebut the presumption of inability to pay debts, leading to the court&#039;s decision. The judgment emphasized the importance of honoring financial obligations and the legal consequences of failing to repay debts as per the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 10:14:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145536" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 544 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108519</link>
      <description>The court granted the winding up petition under section 433(e) of the Companies Act, appointing the Official Liquidator as the Provisional Liquidator of the respondent company due to an outstanding payment dispute. The respondent failed to dispute the debt and did not provide evidence to rebut the presumption of inability to pay debts, leading to the court&#039;s decision. The judgment emphasized the importance of honoring financial obligations and the legal consequences of failing to repay debts as per the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108519</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>