<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 537 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108506</link>
    <description>The appeal by the Management of Harihar Polyfibres was allowed, setting aside the order of the learned single Judge and dismissing the Writ Petition No. 25799 of 1991. The Court held that the decision to wind up and subsequently amalgamate Karnataka Pulpwood Limited with Karnataka Forest Development Corporation Limited was a policy decision taken after due deliberation and was not arbitrary or against public interest. The Court also reaffirmed the limited scope of judicial review in such policy matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 18:45:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145523" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 537 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108506</link>
      <description>The appeal by the Management of Harihar Polyfibres was allowed, setting aside the order of the learned single Judge and dismissing the Writ Petition No. 25799 of 1991. The Court held that the decision to wind up and subsequently amalgamate Karnataka Pulpwood Limited with Karnataka Forest Development Corporation Limited was a policy decision taken after due deliberation and was not arbitrary or against public interest. The Court also reaffirmed the limited scope of judicial review in such policy matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108506</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>