<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (5) TMI 376 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108505</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai ordered the respondent to deposit Rs. 40 lakhs, which was done by debit to the RG 23A account. The Commissioner&#039;s contention that the deposit should have been made in cash or from the personal ledger account was dismissed. The Tribunal accepted compliance based on the deposit made, citing precedent in Birla Yamaha Ltd v. CCE. The Commissioner&#039;s application was ultimately dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2016 11:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (5) TMI 376 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108505</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai ordered the respondent to deposit Rs. 40 lakhs, which was done by debit to the RG 23A account. The Commissioner&#039;s contention that the deposit should have been made in cash or from the personal ledger account was dismissed. The Tribunal accepted compliance based on the deposit made, citing precedent in Birla Yamaha Ltd v. CCE. The Commissioner&#039;s application was ultimately dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108505</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>