https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108505 Deposit by debit to the Modvat account was treated as valid compliance with a Tribunal pre-deposit direction where the Tribunal had already accepted the deposit made from the RG 23A account. The Commissioner could not challenge that acceptance or sit in judgment over it. Since the stay order did not require payment only in cash or through the personal ledger account, compliance through debit to the Modvat account remained sufficient. The cited authority was consistent with that position. The Commissioner's application was therefore without merit. en-us Thu, 22 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Dec 2016 11:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108505 Deposit by debit to the Modvat account was treated as valid compliance with a Tribunal pre-deposit direction where the Tribunal had already accepted the deposit made from the RG 23A account. The Commissioner could not challenge that acceptance or sit in judgment over it. Since the stay order did not require payment only in cash or through the personal ledger account, compliance through debit to the Modvat account remained sufficient. The cited authority was consistent with that position. The Commissioner's application was therefore without merit. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 22 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108505