<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (5) TMI 375 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108503</link>
    <description>Non-accountal of manufactured textile goods in the statutory register was treated as sufficient to render them liable to confiscation under the Central Excise Rules. The explanation that the goods were awaiting buyer approval or had been entered elsewhere was rejected because there was no legal basis for keeping manufactured goods unrecorded in the relevant register. In cases of non-accountal, confiscation and penalty could be sustained without proof of mens rea, and the appellate authority&#039;s contrary reduction was held unsustainable. The confiscation and penalty were restored in substance, with only the redemption fine and penalty moderated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 18:41:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (5) TMI 375 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108503</link>
      <description>Non-accountal of manufactured textile goods in the statutory register was treated as sufficient to render them liable to confiscation under the Central Excise Rules. The explanation that the goods were awaiting buyer approval or had been entered elsewhere was rejected because there was no legal basis for keeping manufactured goods unrecorded in the relevant register. In cases of non-accountal, confiscation and penalty could be sustained without proof of mens rea, and the appellate authority&#039;s contrary reduction was held unsustainable. The confiscation and penalty were restored in substance, with only the redemption fine and penalty moderated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108503</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>