<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (5) TMI 374 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108502</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, finding that Rule 173Q applied instead of Rule 226. The case was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for reevaluation based on relevant judgments, overturning the modification of the penalty order and setting aside the confiscation of goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 18:39:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145519" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (5) TMI 374 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108502</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, finding that Rule 173Q applied instead of Rule 226. The case was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for reevaluation based on relevant judgments, overturning the modification of the penalty order and setting aside the confiscation of goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108502</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>