https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108498 Refiling an oppression and mismanagement petition before the Company Law Board after withdrawal from the High Court with express liberty did not amount to forum shopping or abuse of process, because the later filing was a permitted continuation of the same dispute. The delay could not be treated as laches merely because the matter had remained pending in the High Court, since the earlier proceedings and the court-sanctioned refiling explained the lapse. The adverse findings on forum shopping and limitation were set aside, and the matter was remitted for decision on the merits within a fixed time. en-us Mon, 10 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Mar 2012 18:29:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108498 Refiling an oppression and mismanagement petition before the Company Law Board after withdrawal from the High Court with express liberty did not amount to forum shopping or abuse of process, because the later filing was a permitted continuation of the same dispute. The delay could not be treated as laches merely because the matter had remained pending in the High Court, since the earlier proceedings and the court-sanctioned refiling explained the lapse. The adverse findings on forum shopping and limitation were set aside, and the matter was remitted for decision on the merits within a fixed time. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 10 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108498