https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108496 Remission or setting aside of a reasoned arbitral award is not justified merely because additional documents were allegedly withheld, unless those materials are truly material and disclose a legally sustainable ground for interference. The court reiterated that remission under Section 16 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 is discretionary and is ordinarily confined to awards containing omissions, defects, executory difficulty, or an error apparent on the face of the award. It also held that review does not extend to reappraising the merits beyond the award and incorporated documents. Because the relied-upon materials were only third-party opinions and did not show that the arbitrator acted beyond jurisdiction or committed misconduct, the award was left undisturbed. en-us Fri, 07 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Mar 2012 18:25:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108496 Remission or setting aside of a reasoned arbitral award is not justified merely because additional documents were allegedly withheld, unless those materials are truly material and disclose a legally sustainable ground for interference. The court reiterated that remission under Section 16 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 is discretionary and is ordinarily confined to awards containing omissions, defects, executory difficulty, or an error apparent on the face of the award. It also held that review does not extend to reappraising the merits beyond the award and incorporated documents. Because the relied-upon materials were only third-party opinions and did not show that the arbitrator acted beyond jurisdiction or committed misconduct, the award was left undisturbed. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 07 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108496