<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 531 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108488</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal in a dispute over a promissory note, setting aside the lower appellate court&#039;s judgment. The court held that the burden to prove the absence of consideration lies with the defendant and that failure to produce account books does not necessarily imply lack of consideration. As the defendant failed to provide convincing evidence to rebut the presumption of consideration under section 118 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the plaintiff&#039;s suit based on the promissory note was decreed in favor of the plaintiff.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 18:08:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145505" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 531 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108488</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal in a dispute over a promissory note, setting aside the lower appellate court&#039;s judgment. The court held that the burden to prove the absence of consideration lies with the defendant and that failure to produce account books does not necessarily imply lack of consideration. As the defendant failed to provide convincing evidence to rebut the presumption of consideration under section 118 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the plaintiff&#039;s suit based on the promissory note was decreed in favor of the plaintiff.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108488</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>