<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 426 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108484</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellants for wrong availment of Cenvat credit, ruling that the inadvertent error did not demonstrate an intention to evade duty, especially as the duty was paid before the show cause notice. The Tribunal found the mandatory penalty under Section 11AC unwarranted, aligning with previous tribunal decisions. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 18:03:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145501" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 426 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108484</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellants for wrong availment of Cenvat credit, ruling that the inadvertent error did not demonstrate an intention to evade duty, especially as the duty was paid before the show cause notice. The Tribunal found the mandatory penalty under Section 11AC unwarranted, aligning with previous tribunal decisions. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>