<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 528 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108481</link>
    <description>The High Court clarified that Section 100A of the CPC does not prevent appeals under special statutes like the Trade Marks Act. Appeals under Section 109(5) of the Trade Marks Act are maintainable before a Division Bench despite Section 100A of the CPC. The Court emphasized that special statutes prevail over general procedural codes. The Letters Patent does not override special statute provisions. The Court overruled objections to appeal maintainability, directing the appeals to the appropriate Division Bench.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 17:58:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145498" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 528 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108481</link>
      <description>The High Court clarified that Section 100A of the CPC does not prevent appeals under special statutes like the Trade Marks Act. Appeals under Section 109(5) of the Trade Marks Act are maintainable before a Division Bench despite Section 100A of the CPC. The Court emphasized that special statutes prevail over general procedural codes. The Letters Patent does not override special statute provisions. The Court overruled objections to appeal maintainability, directing the appeals to the appropriate Division Bench.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108481</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>