https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108479 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the petition seeking to quash proceedings in C.C. No. 290/2002 under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The court held that the conditions for liability under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act were met, emphasizing the essential elements required for liability. The court also addressed technical defects in the accused's name, clarifying that discrepancies could be rectified during trial. Additionally, the court upheld the validity of the complaint regarding a dishonored cheque issued by the accused on behalf of another company, allowing the case to proceed under section 138 of the Act. en-us Mon, 03 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Mar 2012 17:55:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108479 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the petition seeking to quash proceedings in C.C. No. 290/2002 under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The court held that the conditions for liability under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act were met, emphasizing the essential elements required for liability. The court also addressed technical defects in the accused's name, clarifying that discrepancies could be rectified during trial. Additionally, the court upheld the validity of the complaint regarding a dishonored cheque issued by the accused on behalf of another company, allowing the case to proceed under section 138 of the Act. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 03 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108479