https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108479 Criminal proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act were not liable to be quashed under Section 482 CrPC where the complaint prima facie disclosed a business transaction, a legally enforceable debt, issuance and dishonour of the cheque for insufficiency of funds, notice, and non-payment within the statutory period. A mistaken surname of the accused was treated as a technical defect because identity as the concerned director was not disputed. The plea that the cheque was issued on behalf of another company raised disputed factual issues and could not justify quashing at the threshold; the matter was required to proceed to trial. en-us Mon, 03 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Mar 2012 17:55:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108479 Criminal proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act were not liable to be quashed under Section 482 CrPC where the complaint prima facie disclosed a business transaction, a legally enforceable debt, issuance and dishonour of the cheque for insufficiency of funds, notice, and non-payment within the statutory period. A mistaken surname of the accused was treated as a technical defect because identity as the concerned director was not disputed. The plea that the cheque was issued on behalf of another company raised disputed factual issues and could not justify quashing at the threshold; the matter was required to proceed to trial. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 03 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108479