https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108476 The District Judge had jurisdiction to grant an ad interim ex parte injunction in a suit for partition, despite the bar under Section 18 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993. The civil court could safeguard parties' interests pending the suit, and the auction conducted by the Recovery Officer was deemed irregular and non est in the eye of the law. The court dismissed the civil revision petition, affirming the civil court's jurisdiction and emphasizing the availability of alternative remedies rather than invoking High Court supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution. en-us Mon, 03 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Mar 2012 17:28:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108476 The District Judge had jurisdiction to grant an ad interim ex parte injunction in a suit for partition, despite the bar under Section 18 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993. The civil court could safeguard parties' interests pending the suit, and the auction conducted by the Recovery Officer was deemed irregular and non est in the eye of the law. The court dismissed the civil revision petition, affirming the civil court's jurisdiction and emphasizing the availability of alternative remedies rather than invoking High Court supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 03 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108476