<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 421 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108475</link>
    <description>The appeal was partially allowed, confirming the duty demand of Rs. 2,44,800 and the reversal of Modvat credit of Rs. 72,599. The penalties imposed on the appellant were upheld based on the findings that the chemicals in question did not qualify as &quot;capital goods&quot; under Rule 57T and discrepancies in the appellant&#039;s declarations regarding the use of the chemicals in manufacturing processes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 17:41:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 421 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108475</link>
      <description>The appeal was partially allowed, confirming the duty demand of Rs. 2,44,800 and the reversal of Modvat credit of Rs. 72,599. The penalties imposed on the appellant were upheld based on the findings that the chemicals in question did not qualify as &quot;capital goods&quot; under Rule 57T and discrepancies in the appellant&#039;s declarations regarding the use of the chemicals in manufacturing processes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108475</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>