<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 420 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108474</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the appeal was condoned because the appellant had acted under a bona fide mistaken belief that the order was not appealable and had been awaiting the Department&#039;s response to representations; the appeal was therefore entertained. Interim exemption from pre-deposit and stay of demand recovery were granted because the dispute on the correct rule for determining annual production capacity required detailed consideration at final hearing, making recovery protection appropriate pending adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 17:30:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145491" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 420 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108474</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the appeal was condoned because the appellant had acted under a bona fide mistaken belief that the order was not appealable and had been awaiting the Department&#039;s response to representations; the appeal was therefore entertained. Interim exemption from pre-deposit and stay of demand recovery were granted because the dispute on the correct rule for determining annual production capacity required detailed consideration at final hearing, making recovery protection appropriate pending adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108474</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>