<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 418 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108472</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai allowed the appeal, remanding the case back to the Commissioner of Central Excise due to bias in the order. The appellants were directed to be provided with the verification report and given a hearing for a fresh decision on the duty demand, irregular credit availed, and penalties imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 17:28:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145489" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 418 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108472</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai allowed the appeal, remanding the case back to the Commissioner of Central Excise due to bias in the order. The appellants were directed to be provided with the verification report and given a hearing for a fresh decision on the duty demand, irregular credit availed, and penalties imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>