<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 416 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108469</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Assistant Commissioner to reassess the eligibility of the tanks for credit under Rule 57Q. If found eligible, the Tribunal expressed willingness to grant credit on the coating material as components/accessories of the eligible tanks. Other issues raised in the appeal were also remanded for further consideration. The previous denial of Modvat credit was set aside, and the matter was directed for reevaluation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 17:21:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145486" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 416 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108469</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Assistant Commissioner to reassess the eligibility of the tanks for credit under Rule 57Q. If found eligible, the Tribunal expressed willingness to grant credit on the coating material as components/accessories of the eligible tanks. Other issues raised in the appeal were also remanded for further consideration. The previous denial of Modvat credit was set aside, and the matter was directed for reevaluation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108469</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>