<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 415 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108468</link>
    <description>Where job-worker waste generated from inputs sent under Rule 57F is cleared on payment of duty, the principal manufacturer may still claim re-credit of the full amount earlier debited, because such waste is excluded from the return requirement and need not be physically returned. The entitlement depends on reading Rule 57F as a whole and on proper proof that the waste was actually duty-paid at clearance. Evidence such as duty-paid challans or certification by the jurisdictional Range Officer is required to support the credit claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 17:19:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145485" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 415 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108468</link>
      <description>Where job-worker waste generated from inputs sent under Rule 57F is cleared on payment of duty, the principal manufacturer may still claim re-credit of the full amount earlier debited, because such waste is excluded from the return requirement and need not be physically returned. The entitlement depends on reading Rule 57F as a whole and on proper proof that the waste was actually duty-paid at clearance. Evidence such as duty-paid challans or certification by the jurisdictional Range Officer is required to support the credit claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108468</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>