<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 522 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108461</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellants exemption under Serial No. 18 of the Notification. It held that goods classified as television receivers with a computer facility should be eligible for the exemption, as there was no exclusion for such goods under Serial No. 18. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of a strict construction of exemption Notifications and ensuring that the benefit of the exemption was not unjustly denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 16:59:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145478" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 522 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108461</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellants exemption under Serial No. 18 of the Notification. It held that goods classified as television receivers with a computer facility should be eligible for the exemption, as there was no exclusion for such goods under Serial No. 18. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of a strict construction of exemption Notifications and ensuring that the benefit of the exemption was not unjustly denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108461</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>