<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 520 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108459</link>
    <description>An adjudication order was held unsustainable where the Commissioner who passed the final order had not himself granted the personal hearing. A hearing before a predecessor Commissioner, followed by transfer and decision by another authority, did not satisfy the requirement of natural justice. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after affording the appellants a proper personal hearing before the deciding authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 16:56:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 520 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108459</link>
      <description>An adjudication order was held unsustainable where the Commissioner who passed the final order had not himself granted the personal hearing. A hearing before a predecessor Commissioner, followed by transfer and decision by another authority, did not satisfy the requirement of natural justice. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after affording the appellants a proper personal hearing before the deciding authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>