<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 519 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108458</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the benefit of Notification No. 305/79-C.E. was not available to the Appellants as they did not fulfill the condition of manufacturing Caprolactum from duty paid Benzene. The Tribunal emphasized that exemption conditions must be fully satisfied. The duty demand was upheld, but penalty and interest were set aside due to procedural reasons and statutory provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 16:17:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 519 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108458</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the benefit of Notification No. 305/79-C.E. was not available to the Appellants as they did not fulfill the condition of manufacturing Caprolactum from duty paid Benzene. The Tribunal emphasized that exemption conditions must be fully satisfied. The duty demand was upheld, but penalty and interest were set aside due to procedural reasons and statutory provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>