https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108457 Orders of the Debts Recovery Tribunal that substantially affect a party's rights or liabilities are appealable, because the expressions "any order" and "an order" under the recovery statute are wide enough to include such interlocutory orders, though not mere procedural directions. Regulations 31 and 32 of the 1998 Practice Regulations were upheld as valid: the Tribunal may proceed by affidavit and permit cross-examination only where sufficient reasons exist and it is considered necessary. Writ interference under Articles 226 and 227 was declined because an adequate statutory appeal was available and no exceptional ground such as lack of jurisdiction or breach of natural justice was shown. en-us Fri, 28 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Mar 2012 16:30:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108457 Orders of the Debts Recovery Tribunal that substantially affect a party's rights or liabilities are appealable, because the expressions "any order" and "an order" under the recovery statute are wide enough to include such interlocutory orders, though not mere procedural directions. Regulations 31 and 32 of the 1998 Practice Regulations were upheld as valid: the Tribunal may proceed by affidavit and permit cross-examination only where sufficient reasons exist and it is considered necessary. Writ interference under Articles 226 and 227 was declined because an adequate statutory appeal was available and no exceptional ground such as lack of jurisdiction or breach of natural justice was shown. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 28 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108457