<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (2) TMI 356 - HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108457</link>
    <description>The court held that an interim order passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal is appealable before the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal if it substantially affects the parties&#039; rights or liabilities. It upheld the validity of Regulations 31 and 32, emphasizing the need for expeditious recovery processes while ensuring natural justice. The court declined to interfere under Articles 226 and 227 due to the availability of an alternative appellate remedy. Petitioners were allowed to appeal within six weeks, with the Tribunal directed not to dismiss on grounds of limitation. The writ petitions were disposed of without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 16:30:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145474" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (2) TMI 356 - HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108457</link>
      <description>The court held that an interim order passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal is appealable before the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal if it substantially affects the parties&#039; rights or liabilities. It upheld the validity of Regulations 31 and 32, emphasizing the need for expeditious recovery processes while ensuring natural justice. The court declined to interfere under Articles 226 and 227 due to the availability of an alternative appellate remedy. Petitioners were allowed to appeal within six weeks, with the Tribunal directed not to dismiss on grounds of limitation. The writ petitions were disposed of without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>